4 ms·
Operationally, unsure. But if there was an answer, it would be something that multiplied with itself twice would have be the same as 2 multiplied with itself on
by prionassembly 6y ago
Operationally, unsure. But if there was an answer, it would be something that multiplied with itself twice would have be the same as 2 multiplied with itself once.
I think it was Gerolamo Cardano who in a book of worked exercises came up with a problem like "obtain two numbers that add to 10 and multiply to 40" and arrived at the solution had to involve square roots of -1. Then he goes "this makes no sense, but let's calculate nevertheless..."
- Garlef 6y ago> it would be something that multiplied with itself twice would have be the same as 2 multiplied with itself once from what i recall that's the way to go: You can use this to extend the definition of exponentials as "repeated addition" from allowing only natural numbers expoonents to allowing positive rational numbers. Afterwards you can "complete" this to allow real exponents. But this requires some hard maths to do rigorously.
- prionassembly 6y agoYou're absolutely right about rigor: I'm not claiming that Cardano discovered complex analysis or anything...