I can't see the paper [1]. But the code is here: https://github.com/kazumi-ozaki/lifespan/blob/master/main.f90 https://github.com/kazumi-ozaki/lifespan/blob/ma

I can't see the paper [1]. But the code is here: https://github.com/kazumi-ozaki/lifespan/blob/master/main.f90 https://github.com/kazumi-ozaki/lifespan/blob/master/main.f9... It does not give me great confidence in the modeling. Perhaps the paper goes into great detail about the formulas used in the code, and explains those variables and naming choices (those not in the Constants file with comments), or the fitting coefficients. Of course, I really wonder how the complexity of the natural world could be captured by a few hundred variables. 1. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-021-00693-5#data-availability https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-021-00693-5#data-avai...