4 ms·
Arguably, what they're saying is that 2 x 3 should be understood as a unit-less "scaler" 2 that multiplies a number (of things) "3".
by d--b 6y ago
Arguably, what they're saying is that 2 x 3 should be understood as a unit-less "scaler" 2 that multiplies a number (of things) "3".