3 ms·

Well, be careful. This is according to Sunde. We don’t know what they said or for that matter, if IVANN even called him.

• boomboomsubban 6y ago
  Even without the particularly damming phone call, the ICANN looks fairly terrible in this exchange.
  • Hnrobert42 6y ago
    Again, particularly damning according to one person.
• 4cao 6y ago
  ICANN were asked to comment on the story but chose not to do so. If they have anything to say, they are free to issue a statement anytime. Meanwhile, what we know so far, together with their lack of response, should be more than enough to have an opinion about the whole situation.
  • jmull 6y ago
    You can form your opinion based on anything you want... But if you do it based on an unsubstantiated semi-incoherent one-sided account, I think we can safely say you don't care about the truth of the matter.
    • Goronmon 6y ago
      But if you do it based on an unsubstantiated semi-incoherent one-sided account, I think we can safely say you don't care about the truth of the matter. So, people or groups are immune from criticism as long as they refuse to speak on the issue? I guess that's one stance to take.
      • rimiform 6y ago
        I think that's precisely what ICANN was going for. Reacting to it, in the eyes of some people, implies there's at least some truth to what the other party said.
      • jmull 6y ago
        Of course not. But I don't think there's a logical connection between that and what I said.
    • sodality2 6y ago
      No response is a response.
    • Griffinsauce 6y ago
      Could you back up "semi incoherent"? His story reads perfectly reasonable to me.