I've been on the other end of a journalist with a grudge, and it's not something I'd wish on anyone. It's interesting that the technical language in the articl

I've been on the other end of a journalist with a grudge, and it's not something I'd wish on anyone. It's interesting that the technical language in the article is so clearly mangled. Either Ars Technica has no editors that know how to edit (unlikely), or that know the basics of git (again, it seems unlikely). It reads like a journalist taking notes from a dev ("uh-huh, a 'git', right. Oh, no a 'git commit'. really?").