3 ms·
Yes, you've posted this elsewhere. Your sourcing is very poor on this, and you don't make it clear that it's residue, rather than an ingredient (further, you ex
by throwaway5752 6y ago
Yes, you've posted this elsewhere. Your sourcing is very poor on this, and you don't make it clear that it's residue, rather than an ingredient (further, you exaggerate the hazard substantially, this is something that is consumed in large quantities for treating constipation).
To be clear, it is not an ingredient, and it is Generally Recognized as Safe in multiple applications (https://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/food-additive-status-list#ftnM https://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/food-addit...) and it's pretty obvious from the product this is food equipment lubrication.
- therealmarv 6y agoBetter a poor sourcing than no sourcing. Yes I don't got it 100% right, sorry for my English. It was never meant to be a scientific thesis. But people should be aware that Beyond Meat are doing things not good enough (at least in Europe) and knowledge transfer and awareness are the only things that matter here.