3 ms·
You have a very good point! I has also been shown that under the right conditions grazing lands can actually sequester carbon [1]. So there is no a priori arg
by pcrh 6y ago
You have a very good point!
I has also been shown that under the right conditions grazing lands can actually sequester carbon [1].
So there is no a priori argument against meat from the point of view of climate effects, though there are obviously better and worse practices.
[1] http://www.fao.org/3/i1880e/i1880e00.htm http://www.fao.org/3/i1880e/i1880e00.htm
- bjoli 6y agoThe area needed for that kind of farming is prohibitively large if we want to sustain current levels of consumption, though. Those bison the parent poster talks about moved over a pretty darn huge area: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_bison_belt https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_bison_belt