4 ms·
I agree that the title is very poor. "Robot AI beats world-class curling competitors at throwing accuracy" would be better. It's still an impressive feat.
by SamBam 6y ago
I agree that the title is very poor. "Robot AI beats world-class curling competitors at throwing accuracy" would be better.
It's still an impressive feat.
- jvanderbot 6y ago"Humans become better at curling thanks to robotic assistance" They're not foes. They're tools baselined against human performance.
- EGreg 6y agoUp next Jeopardy bot has faster fingers than human competitors
- Apes 6y agoEven saying the "AI" beats the curling competitors at throwing accuracy isn't correct. The AI has access to a highly precise mechanisms for controlling the power it throws with. Would the AI actually be any better than the players if the players had access to a similarly high precision devices for controlling throwing power that the AI is using?
- throw_away 6y agoOh, and I suppose Pitchomat 5000 was just a modified howitzer?