4 ms·

This is going to be confused with Microsoft Teams for Education. It will also be hard to search for, again given Microsoft Teams.

amasad 6y ago
Amazing how Microsoft monopolized a generic word like "Teams". Luckily Replit has a good brand name in education, it's pretty easy to google for, and it grows mostly by word-of-mouth.
- colejohnson66 6y ago
  Apple “monopolized” the generic fruit “apple” and no one batted an eye (except maybe the Beatles). There’s countless examples of generic words being trademarked.
  - jdminhbg 6y ago
    The difference is that "apple" is unrelated to the product space, but "teams" is not.
  - filoleg 6y ago
    I don't think the parent comment meant it as some bad evil thing. More like just a factual curiosity, sort of as "huh, damn, pretty interesting how they have managed to do it." On a personal level, I think the Apple case is a bit different. There is no other technical product that is named Apple, and neither it is inherently the word used to describe what a product or a company does. While Teams definitely falls under the "similar enough" umbrella of words related to the function of the product. Not that it makes any difference, and, in fact, I think it was pretty clever of MSFT to manage to make that product name work, since I was pretty skeptical of how well it was gonna work at first.
    - colejohnson66 6y ago
      > I don't think the parent comment meant it as some bad evil thing. More like just a factual curiosity, sort of as "huh, damn, pretty interesting how they have managed to do it." Right. I read it as that too, but I see I may have come off too strong. I was agreeing with OP while mentioning that others have done it as well.
  - watwut 6y ago
    Because people like Apple software. Unlike MS Teams which I hate with passion.
- onewhonknocks 6y ago
  I also thought this was about Microsoft Teams TBH.
- trevorishere 6y ago
  Without adding "Replit" to my search term, I couldn't find your product on the first three page of Bing or Google in a private mode browser. But if you have good in-roads with the edu space, this seems like less of an issue.

amasad 6y ago

Amazing how Microsoft monopolized a generic word like "Teams". Luckily Replit has a good brand name in education, it's pretty easy to google for, and it grows mostly by word-of-mouth.

colejohnson66 6y ago
Apple “monopolized” the generic fruit “apple” and no one batted an eye (except maybe the Beatles). There’s countless examples of generic words being trademarked.
- jdminhbg 6y ago
  The difference is that "apple" is unrelated to the product space, but "teams" is not.
- filoleg 6y ago
  I don't think the parent comment meant it as some bad evil thing. More like just a factual curiosity, sort of as "huh, damn, pretty interesting how they have managed to do it." On a personal level, I think the Apple case is a bit different. There is no other technical product that is named Apple, and neither it is inherently the word used to describe what a product or a company does. While Teams definitely falls under the "similar enough" umbrella of words related to the function of the product. Not that it makes any difference, and, in fact, I think it was pretty clever of MSFT to manage to make that product name work, since I was pretty skeptical of how well it was gonna work at first.
  - colejohnson66 6y ago
    > I don't think the parent comment meant it as some bad evil thing. More like just a factual curiosity, sort of as "huh, damn, pretty interesting how they have managed to do it." Right. I read it as that too, but I see I may have come off too strong. I was agreeing with OP while mentioning that others have done it as well.
- watwut 6y ago
  Because people like Apple software. Unlike MS Teams which I hate with passion.
onewhonknocks 6y ago
I also thought this was about Microsoft Teams TBH.
trevorishere 6y ago
Without adding "Replit" to my search term, I couldn't find your product on the first three page of Bing or Google in a private mode browser. But if you have good in-roads with the edu space, this seems like less of an issue.