3 ms·
I agree with the sentiment, but there needs to be some degree of leeway. For example are server logs considered tracking? It seems unreasonable to require that
by Shared404 6y ago
I agree with the sentiment, but there needs to be some degree of leeway.
For example are server logs considered tracking? It seems unreasonable to require that logs not be kept.
Edit: On further thought, I don't even know that tracking should be banned. Instead, I would argue that advertising in the way enabled by tracking should be banned. That way the incentive is removed with less bureaucracy.
- samstave 6y agobureaucracy IS the incentive. We need to kill bureaucratic interests in EVERY THING. Politicians should be conscripted servants with no method for empowering or financing themselves. They should run on policy ALONE.
- Shared404 6y ago> bureaucracy IS the incentive I don't agree there. There is no reason that someone has building bureaucracy as they're goal. The goal is to get something out of it, which is accomplished via the bureaucracy. > We need to kill bureaucratic interests in EVERY THING. While I don't necessarily disagree, this is orthogonal to the original issue. > Politicians should be conscripted servants with no method for empowering or financing themselves. I don't think conscripted means what you think it means... Also, that would be impossible to implement. Either you don't try to cut off every path, in which case you have the option of limiting bureaucracy, or you try to cut off every path, increasing bureaucracy. > They should run on policy ALONE. I agree. Also orthogonal to the topic at hand. Also, please let me know if you find a way of implementing this without requiring bureaucracy as a critical component.