> Another instance of him asserting pedantic reasoning against a hard emotional opinion. This is the crux of the issue! It's not about racism at all. It's abou

> Another instance of him asserting pedantic reasoning against a hard emotional opinion. This is the crux of the issue! It's not about racism at all. It's about there being no nuance or context, to the point where someone gets offended and that offense is lauded as the highest level of experience: offense beats reason and logic. It doesn't matter if you are right, because you offended somebody. > Material he knows well is making people uncomfortable, but believes he is not at all accountable for. Yes, because he was hired to teach teenagers things. Not to make them comfortable. And teaching is about expanding minds, not just regurgiating facts. Expansion is uncomfortable. We find comfort in the familiar. A great teacher will seldom make people feel comfortable. None of your "red flags" seem that red flag to me. Does he seem hard headed to me? Yes. But I believe in this case, he has a very good reason to be. How much more power are we going to give offended teenagers?