The CEO of Gab used a transphobic slur while describing the hack in question. To be clear, the words were: "Mentally ill tr**ny demon hackers (I’m very serious

The CEO of Gab used a transphobic slur while describing the hack in question. To be clear, the words were: "Mentally ill tr**ny demon hackers (I’m very serious) are attacking Gab right now." The article then quotes the rest of the tweet. How is it irrelevant to briefly talk about the introduction paragraph of the tweet before discussing its more technical content?