2 ms·
> Yes, paying researchers to 'review' Literally not at all what i'm saying, but I am apparently failing to communicate today, so I'll give up. But yes, I thin
by jrochkind1 6y ago
> Yes, paying researchers to 'review'
Literally not at all what i'm saying, but I am apparently failing to communicate today, so I'll give up.
But yes, I think changes in "broad, institutional practice" are required to fix the current severe problems in academic publishing, of which a lack of peer review labor is only a small part.
- jariel 6y ago"Is peer review also the assumption or implication of their role? If not, should it be," This is what I was responding to assuming you were implying that in general should 'researchers also be paid to review, implied as part of their job description'. As if to say 'reviewing should go hand in hand with publishing' as part of the normal paid activity of researchers. That probably makes the most sense but would require a lot of institutions getting on board.