4 ms·
I think that's the biggest challenge for a project like this. If it's going to break backward compatibility, it's hard to attract new users even if it's clearly
by tharne 6y ago
I think that's the biggest challenge for a project like this. If it's going to break backward compatibility, it's hard to attract new users even if it's clearly an improvement over vim. Ironically, that was the whole issue with Plan9. It was better, just not a big enough improvement to justify replacing something that was widely viewed as "good enough".
- gbrown_ 6y agoI mean it's a separate project so it has nothing to break "compatibility" with and it's made clear [1][2] the aim is to be different. Given the author is part of the suckless community I really don't think they care about attracting users either. I admire Vis but at the end of the day a text editor is just a tool. When the investment into changing out such a tool becomes worth it is entirely user dependent. [1] https://github.com/martanne/vis#non-goals https://github.com/martanne/vis#non-goals [2] https://github.com/martanne/vis/wiki/Differences-from-Vi(m) https://github.com/martanne/vis/wiki/Differences-from-Vi(m)
- tharne 6y agoFair enough. I wasn't posting that as a criticism. I'm a big fan of suckless tools, dwm, st, and surf in particular (I may be the only person who likes surf), and I truly hope vis succeeds and is around for the long term. I'm hoping vis can attract enough users to develop enough of an extension ecosystem that it could be used in place of vim or neovim as a daily driver