3 ms·
Honestly, as someone who spends a significant amount of time reading and attempting to replicate papers... I have very little faith in most papers, though the c
by lettergram 6y ago
Honestly, as someone who spends a significant amount of time reading and attempting to replicate papers... I have very little faith in most papers, though the concepts themselves often appear okay.
My friends and family also doing research have added to my questioning most papers. It’s probably healthy to have a lot of skepticism, the paper itself should convince through the research methods and sample size.
Unfortunately, the incentives align more with skirting the truth than being honest. That’s why each paper, in my opinion, requires a healthy dose of skepticism.
As an example, in January 2021 the PCR protocol to identify covid-19 was finally updated and a warning sent out that there were possible issues. Specifically, issues that would lead to higher false positives. My wife who does PCRs regularly immediately identified the issue in AUGUST 2021. This means it had to have been known prior to that date, yet wasn’t discussed for political reasons
- webmaven 6y ago> My wife who does PCRs regularly immediately identified the issue in AUGUST 2021. Well, heck, predicting the future and pointing out other people's mistakes is dead easy when you have access to a time-machine, isn't it?
- lettergram 6y agoThe point I'm making is they knew months prior to announcing it that there was an issue. If we were worried about the "science" it would have been announced right away, instead it was the day after inauguration.