I found this assertion, near the end of the article, questionable: “Science as inquiry,” with its focus on evidence and logic, can do no more than communicate

I found this assertion, near the end of the article, questionable: “Science as inquiry,” with its focus on evidence and logic, can do no more than communicate the details of a few empirical studies. To my knowledge, inquiry can be as broad or as narrow as one wishes to make it. The utility of evidence and logic is not limited to narrow domains, is it? I hope I’m not just cherry picking something to satisfy my own biases.