4 ms·
Yes. And their names should be attached to anything they review (including the papers they reject) so that they have some skin in the game.
by karl11 6y ago
Yes. And their names should be attached to anything they review (including the papers they reject) so that they have some skin in the game.
- foobarbecue 6y agoHunh, this is a great idea. Rejected articles should be published as rejected, and all reviews should be published. I guess this is a bit like the open review model, like The Cryosphere uses, except I think they hide papers after the discussion period if they aren't accepted.
- michaelmior 6y agoI think the problem with this is that it can encourage retaliation. If I know you rejected my paper, I might be incline to reject yours. Now, a nobody like me probably can't get away with doing that to someone with an established reputation. But the other way around is certainly possible.