3 ms·
No, HTC was the first one to explore a touch only interface. Even before the HTC Touch, their WinMo version allowed for touch only operation for 3-4 years.
by baybal2 6y ago
No, HTC was the first one to explore a touch only interface.
Even before the HTC Touch, their WinMo version allowed for touch only operation for 3-4 years.
- dagw 6y agoAnd before that there was the Ericsson R380. None of them could really be described as working "really well". If you wanted to you could perhaps argue that the PalmPilot was the first touch only portable device that worked "really well", but that wasn't a phone (and you'll have lots of angry Newton fans telling you that are wrong). Or you could try to make an argument for the Treo, but it wasn't really "touch only". As someone who has used every device mentioned above (and owned at least half of them), I personally feel comfortable calling the iPhone the first phone with a touch only interface that worked "really well"
- baybal2 6y agoThe fact that HTC had a working touch shell, and basic suite of touch only apps for WinMo few years prior to Apple stands there. I will also argue that Apple verbatim copied some of their UI ideas.
- tempestn 6y agoI briefly owned an HTC Titan before the iPhone came out. I returned it after a few days and got a flip phone instead. It was just too painful trying to do anything with the finicky stylus on the tiny screen. And yes, it was slow too.