6 ms·
https://terfisaslur.com/ https://terfisaslur.com/
by jl6 6y ago
https://terfisaslur.com/ https://terfisaslur.com/
- midasz 6y agoan entire website with people saying things about terfs but not a single sentence explaining wtf a terf is, i'm too old for twitter feuds
- jl6 6y agoYou could Google it. I was just responding to the request for examples of hate groups running unchecked on Twitter.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- input_sh 6y agoTrans-exclusionary radical feminist. So basically feminists that believe the femininity is endangered by the mere existence of male-to-female transgender people. So basically transphobes that also larp as feminists.
- klodolph 6y agoPlease do not support transphobia.
- jl6 6y agoFor the record, I support mainstream trans rights. I fail to see how evidence of hate and violence coming from trans extremists is transphobic.
- colesantiago 6y ago> For the record, I support mainstream trans rights. Then why the fuck are you bringing up this exclusionary t*rf shit? you sure have a really funny way of showing it.
- jl6 6y agoBecause I think that mainstream trans people are done a great disservice by trans extremists. Do you think trans people benefit from being associated with the kind of tweets on that website? Reasonable trans men and trans women are pushing back on extremist language and calls for violence that are perpetrated in their name. Only by discussing this can peaceful coexistence be achieved.
- colesantiago 6y agoYou're right when it comes to calls to violence, but I would prefer #DieT*rfs or #T*rfsMustDie instead. At least then freedom of speech is preserved and are is no calls for violence. > Only by discussing this can peaceful coexistence be achieved. Would love to see evidence of this and until then, please go tell that to the exclusionary T*rfs FIRST and NOT trans people fighting against them. Be a trans ally.
- oooooooooooow 6y agoThis is part of the reason why a sizeable portion of the population sees you as a cult of lunatics.
- colesantiago 6y agoLunacy for recognising trans women as women and fighting against people that actively deny trans people's existence? I'll take that any day.
- colesantiago 6y agotrans women are women. period.
- jl6 6y agoSome people disagree with that attempt to redefine words. This whole thread is about the right to have that disagreement in a civil fashion, or whether to shut down the thought process with phrases like “period”.
- colesantiago 6y ago> This whole thread is about the right to have that disagreement in a civil fashion. Well fuck their disagreement, there is no civility when you're excluding people. Also, this t*rf shit is not up for discussion and there should be no debate on trans women's existence as women.
- jl6 6y ago“Period”, “fuck [them]”, “not up for discussion”, “no debate”... these are not terms used by successful thinkers. Rather, they are how echo chambers form.
- colesantiago 6y agoI wince at this statement. There is no need to be a "successful thinker" on something that should be common sense. It's OK that you don't want to admit your transphobia and instead continue to drop a viewpoint which trans women and people have been fighting against, but at least be honest.
- jl6 6y agoWhere do you think reasonable viewpoints come from if not from critical thinking? Common sense does not spring full formed from the ether - and by the way, “common sense” has been the rallying cry of reactionary anti-thinking since time immemorial. It is “common sense” that socialism is evil and God is real if you ask your political enemies - of which I am not one, I assure you, despite your seeming to want to pick a fight with me.
- stickfigure 6y agoHow many of these posts are still up? The problem with "pictures of tweets" is that we can't check whether or not these were moderated. The controversy is not over whether garbage get posted, it's over what happens afterward.