9 ms·
I can cherry-pick several thousand twitter messages (probably more) that make this quote seem like a soft, fluffy teddy bear. But no one here accuses twitter of
by lenkite 6y ago
I can cherry-pick several thousand twitter messages (probably more) that make this quote seem like a soft, fluffy teddy bear. But no one here accuses twitter of being a terrorist platform.
Your last line is absolutely correct: To make this obvious, this is not a free speech issue.
- stickfigure 6y ago> I can cherry-pick several thousand twitter messages I've heard this claim asserted before. I am unconvinced. Can you show me some examples?
- throw374u9 6y ago#killallmen and similar hashtags. Verified users advocating genocide!
- rvz 6y agoAnd now 'they' are saying #womxn is transphobic on Twitter. So now everyone using that in the past and present is a transphobe apparently. The potential triggernometry in this complex inclusivity equation boggles my mind. EDIT: Downvoters: So this tweet is not accurate, No? [0] From the reply thread, it shows how 'they' and Twitch are now re-hijacking the artificial term 'womxn' to lose its so-called meaning such that it can be used to cancel those who used it in the past, even when the same progressives coined it! [1] This is how it starts. Redefine progressive terms, find famous person using it, call them out and demand them to apologise to the world right now for using that 'hateful' term they used in the past or be cancelled. All of this because of Gamergate. [0] https://twitter.com/Mr_J_Plays/status/1366669979526062081 https://twitter.com/Mr_J_Plays/status/1366669979526062081 [1] https://twitter.com/batterystapler/status/1366669420265897985 https://twitter.com/batterystapler/status/136666942026589798...
- throw374u9 6y agoYou are overthinking it too much.
- rvz 6y agoBoth the hashtag you mentioned and the tweets in my comment says it all, proves both of our points and is true. Is it not?
- throw374u9 6y agoThere is a difference between genocide and pronouns. First one affect many people, second not so much. First one is pushing Overton window, second is just tiny twitter drama. If anything this BS is great. During gamergate we had to take all the hate without flinching. Today just answer something like "Does #killallmen include transmen?"
- jl6 6y agohttps://terfisaslur.com/ https://terfisaslur.com/
- midasz 6y agoan entire website with people saying things about terfs but not a single sentence explaining wtf a terf is, i'm too old for twitter feuds
- jl6 6y agoYou could Google it. I was just responding to the request for examples of hate groups running unchecked on Twitter.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- input_sh 6y agoTrans-exclusionary radical feminist. So basically feminists that believe the femininity is endangered by the mere existence of male-to-female transgender people. So basically transphobes that also larp as feminists.
- klodolph 6y agoPlease do not support transphobia.
- jl6 6y agoFor the record, I support mainstream trans rights. I fail to see how evidence of hate and violence coming from trans extremists is transphobic.
- colesantiago 6y ago> For the record, I support mainstream trans rights. Then why the fuck are you bringing up this exclusionary t*rf shit? you sure have a really funny way of showing it.
- baix777 6y agoJust because twitter has illegal content doesn't make what parler was doing any less illegal. Just because someone else breaks the law doesn't give you a free pass. This is not a free speech issue on any social media. Amazon had every right to stop illegal activity on their platform.
- lenkite 6y agoI believe the "law" should be applied equally. "Illegal activity" ignored on one platform or given a wink and nod and scanned under a microscope on the other platform is strange. The selective application of policy while pretending to be fair and unbiased tends to make folks cynical.