4 ms·
They got VC money by pretending to be a tech company. Then they set up very good branding. Then they used the VC money to acquire best agents. So their edge
by emilsedgh 6y ago
They got VC money by pretending to be a tech company.
Then they set up very good branding.
Then they used the VC money to acquire best agents.
So their edge is not tech, but branding + good offers to agents.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- doitLP 6y agoYep, this is what they did. They swept through all the big markets a couple years ago and got all the top-selling agents by offering amazing packages. My brother was a top agent in Austin and he got stock, excellent brokerage rates, a lucrative bonus program and a huge stipend for marketing, branding and even 40k toward hiring an assistant. It was an offer no other brokerage could match and he and basically everyone he knew went to Compass.
- tamade 6y agoSome of these top brokers have already started to bail. They've also cut back on their Compass Concierge service, which is just an interest-free loan for sellers to dress up their homes. Guess all that Softbank cash is starting to run out...
- melomal 6y agoThe unicorn playbook. There's going to be VCs on LinkedIn trying to explain why this is such a good long term play...
- Justsignedup 6y agowe got a sales pitch from them basically "we have a culture that the big agents can't and that attracts the best agents to us" so basically culture + back-end not horrible tech = massive success.
- piokoch 6y agoWhat if someone jumps in with a even better offer for agents (fed also by VC money) to "disrupt" Compass? Wouldn't this sink Compass?
- kin 6y agoActually, I can tell you that their original strategy was to have exclusive listings. Last year because Compass had so many agents, they were able to "preview" listings on their site days before MLS. Their hope was that this edge would attract users into using Compass to search for listings over RedFin/Zillow/etc. Fortunately, this practice was banned and they no longer have that card to play.