4 ms·
> RDF data and SPARQL Please no. There are already a ton a triple stores (which all seems to have bad performances when deployed in real), we don’t need that f
by tasogare 6y ago
> RDF data and SPARQL
Please no. There are already a ton a triple stores (which all seems to have bad performances when deployed in real), we don’t need that failed class of technology (the stringly-typed web) to infect sane products.
- jerven 6y agoConsidering this has the same basic structure of an edge (quad) and label (resource) table like the TripleStores of 2009 why would you expect any better performance of this than from those?
- mark_l_watson 6y agoActually, RDF and SPARQL are great technologies. I am on a Knowledge Graph team at a medical AI company, and we made a decision to go with RDF rather than labeled property graphs. Both approaches have pros and cons and a decision is application specific.