Are we supposed to believe a vague allegation from a publication that so badly misrepresents a statement like "You should never call someone a [n-word]"? His u

Are we supposed to believe a vague allegation from a publication that so badly misrepresents a statement like "You should never call someone a [n-word]"? His use of that word was supposed to be a smoking gun, but instead their story seems to be all smoke and mirrors. That's a perfect example of cancel culture: the mere allegation is enough, proof is neither required nor given.