4 ms·
Well said. Your comment reminds me of a conversation from 30+ years ago with a work colleague who opined - or shared the opinion, I cannot remember which - that
by PeterWhittaker 6y ago
Well said. Your comment reminds me of a conversation from 30+ years ago with a work colleague who opined - or shared the opinion, I cannot remember which - that our "input bit rate" was fixed. Young and argumentative, I disputed this, but....
I don't remember all of the arguments in favour, but he pointed out reading: We start sounding out individual letters and eventually progress to scanning whole words or sentences or paragraphs.
It's not that our bit rate changes, it's that our "bit" changes.
Yeah, handwavy I know, I am struggling to recall the conversation.
Essentially, though, consider your point another way: We can only process so many concepts/notions per unit time, and initially, in any subject, our concepts/notions are smaller. As our experience grows, they grow, so our throughput increases, even at the same processing speed.
Sort of like widening a highway to handle more volume at the same speed. Sort of.
- goldenkey 6y agoIn machine learning lingo, you'd have better 'embedding vectors' for the world at large.
- edmundsauto 6y agoThis is what Barbara Oakley (of the popular Coursera course "Learning how to Learn") calls chunking. I think of it like changing the word size based on the topic and my understanding of it.