3 ms·
While I support the endorsement of Amazon's data-driven culture and strategy, I don't think it's fair to describe Apple as its opposite. Apple is not the gut-dr
by jonnathanson 15y ago
While I support the endorsement of Amazon's data-driven culture and strategy, I don't think it's fair to describe Apple as its opposite. Apple is not the gut-driven, "bet the company" firm that the general public seems to think it is. Its bets are very data-driven, albeit not quite as real-time-data-driven as a company like Amazon's, whose business model allows for more real time data in the first place.
In broad strokes, I think I'd describe the two companies this way: Amazon innovates through optimization of new markets, while Apple innovates through creating new markets. This isn't a wholly fair description of either company, and as we know, there are exceptions in either direction. But that's the business model of the two companies at a 30,000-foot glance.
As you've hinted, probably the best way to differentiate the strategies of the two companies is on the risk/reward dimension. Amazon operates on a risk-minimization model, while Apple is risk-seeking in favor of outsized rewards. This is partially because Apple is still a hardware company (for now, at least), and it needs to keep reinventing its products to stay ahead of the commoditization of hardware.
- ChuckFrank 15y ago"Amazon innovates through optimization of new markets, while Apple innovates through creating new markets" Well said.
- sankara 15y agoAmazon has created new markets. The article mentions Kindle and AWS. The ebook reader and ebooks did not (really) exist before Kindle. Same with AWS.
- jonnathanson 15y agoTrue. There are exceptions to the statement I made, which is why I pointed out that it's not wholly fair. In fact, Amazon's entire existence can in many ways be said to have been the creation of a new market. Even still, I think it's fair to say that Amazon primarily innovates these days through rapid and extensive iteration, especially on its consumer side.
- DanielRibeiro 15y agoI've sent it to some of my coleagues an article menting this ("Steve Jobs does customer development" [1]). Still, people refused to accept any evidence that getting facts is better than going with your gut. This is the problem with people that don't believe in facts: they don't believe in the fact that this belief is bad for them. [1] http://venturehacks.com/articles/jobs-customer-development http://venturehacks.com/articles/jobs-customer-development