5 ms·
This will definitely hit the schools that bought into Google the hardest. The district that I grew up in is very tech-heavy– all middle school students get a C
by jackson1442 6y ago
This will definitely hit the schools that bought into Google the hardest.
The district that I grew up in is very tech-heavy– all middle school students get a Chromebook which is then upgraded to a Windows laptop for high school. Chromebooks naturally try to drive you towards storing everything in Google Drive (student devices, if I'm remembering correctly, are configured with about 16GB of storage, maybe less). That will drive up storage use.
Most assignments are delivered and submitted electronically. This uses up storage, especially since Google removed the free-ness aspect from Google Docs and its companion services.
The real "meat" comes from things like video projects, which were a yearly at minimum occurrence. These were usually stored in Google Drive and submitted via Classroom.
To clarify, I don't think it's wrong to charge for your services, especially at a paltry $5/student/yr for an additional 15GB/user. What I do think is wrong is pushing your product with manipulative tactics (making everything free) then suddenly flipping the switch and making everything cost money once everyone's bought in.
- gowld 6y agoWhat's wrong with the people getting the most benefit paying a little more? They aren't paying for a dozen other vendors to fill in the gaps for things they go all in for. You can delete old video if you want.