3 ms·
Sure. I hope they commission a $6 million dollar painting of themself with Napoleon's body and unicorns in the background. It's their money. They can waste it h
by anm89 6y ago
Sure. I hope they commission a $6 million dollar painting of themself with Napoleon's body and unicorns in the background. It's their money. They can waste it however they want.
And unlike your extremely simplistic worldview, it's very possible they'll do something that will create long term value for them. They don't owe it to you to do that though.
- tablespoon 6y ago> Sure. I hope they commission a $6 million dollar painting of themself with Napoleon's body and unicorns in the background. It's their money. They can waste it however they want. You're missing the point: the question is what this $6.6 million transaction for this token mean? Does it mean these NFTs are starting to be taken seriously? Does it mean someone's hyping the tech through a shady transaction? Or does it mean some bozo who won the lotto was willing to blow some money on one? Winning lotto tickets can also be convertible to USD, which can easily be used to buy kitchen appliances, and pants and flights. Noting that doesn't reveal anything about the differences between how lotto winners spend vs. other people. > And unlike your extremely simplistic worldview Excuse me?
- anm89 6y agoNo need to be excused
- Smithalicious 6y agoHow would you know? I feel like it's the principle of charity to assume a transaction is not some kind of shady conspiracy in absence of evidence to the contrary