5 ms·
Google Instant's previews show the +1 button, so I see no reason why Googlebot wouldn't too. I guess Google wait until window.onload fires instead of just timin
by dave1010uk 15y ago
Google Instant's previews show the +1 button, so I see no reason why Googlebot wouldn't too. I guess Google wait until window.onload fires instead of just timing the server sending the 1 HTML file. Google could also use data from Google Toolbar users but I doubt they do.
As the article says, even with a primed cache, the +1 code slows down page load. It also said the overhead can be 2 seconds. If you're aiming for fast then that could double your page load time. External assets are very likely to be calculated into a sites speed as they generally take up quite a bit of the page load time.
Of course, no one knows how much of an effect page speed plays in Google's algorithms. My bet, however, is that adding +1 to a fast site could easily make it drop a few places in the SERPs. If your site is already quite slow then an extra 2 seconds may only be a few % slower.
- pestaa 15y agoYou're assuming search ranking is primarily based on speed. It might weight the ranking, but relevancy must be still dominant. I mean, come on. Sites with maps, ads, or even big images can take up more than two seconds. It's not a big deal. Your analytics tracking code slows everything even more. And it's the same network, the crawler might just go to the next server room.