> is not an engineering problem, it's a political problem That's a political choice, and it doesn't have to be that way. You think it's a hard political proble

> is not an engineering problem, it's a political problem That's a political choice, and it doesn't have to be that way. You think it's a hard political problem because we'd have to make very hard choices (reducing quality of life) with the currently deployed technical solutions. We could push along the R&D levels tech that's already researched, just not deployed (renewables and storage for their intermittent production like li-ion utility scale batteries), and research more some stuff that's barely researched (next gen nuclear, fusion). Having palatable tech solutions would mean not making unpalatable political choices.