3 ms·
> The article does not explain why nuclear must be part of the energy solution. 1. "it generates baseload electricity with no output of carbon," 2. "nuclear p
by mpweiher 6y ago
> The article does not explain why nuclear must be part of the energy solution.
1. "it generates baseload electricity with no output of carbon,"
2. "nuclear power plants operate at much higher capacity factors than renewable energy sources or fossil fuels."
3. "Third, nuclear power releases less radiation into the environment than any other major energy source. "
Now you might not agree with the explanations, but to say it doesn't explain seems...incorrect.
- pfdietz 6y agoNon sequiturs are not explanations. None of those claims imply nuclear must be part of the energy solution.