3 ms·
Yes, I pointed that out. Consider the era between when the Supreme Court said they were unenforceable, and when the Federal government made voluntary adherence
by eesmith 6y ago
Yes, I pointed that out.
Consider the era between when the Supreme Court said they were unenforceable, and when the Federal government made voluntary adherence illegal.
Do you think it would have been unethical for someone in the 1950s to buy a house with a racially restrictive covenant, knowing that they were not going to follow that covenant when they sold it?
If your father had known that person in the 1950s, would he have said that selling the house to a black family gives them a deserved reputation of breaking their word?
Lastly, going back to CA-specific employment law - why can't I agree that if I move to another state then I can be subject to a non-compete agreement that was in the contract when I signed it while living in CA?
- WalterBright 6y ago> Do you think it would have been unethical for someone in the 1950s to buy a house with a racially restrictive covenant, knowing that they were not going to follow that covenant when they sold it? It's a little unfair to judge a 1950s person on modern ethical standards. But I'll take a stab. You can't line out a clause in the covenant like you can in a contract. But you can 1) refuse to buy it or 2) make it clear you'll fight it in court if you need to. As for what my father would do, I don't know. But I do know that he'd judge a man by his honor, his acceptance of responsibility for his actions, and his performance of duty to his country. He did not judge a man by his color, uniform, nationality, etc. And it cost him his career in the Air Force, so he didn't take this lightly.
- eesmith 6y ago#1 means the white separationists get what they want. #2 still hasn't happened, despite decades of activism. So would you father have respected someone who kept his word and judged a man by his color by not selling a house to him? Or would he have respected someone who willfully broke an unforceable agreement to discrimintate on the basis of race? I couldn't tell from your answer. If I sign a contract with a non-compete clause in CA, where it's unenforceable, then move to TX with the same job, is that clause now enforceable? If so, then how is it unethical to sign the contract? EDIT: if it's little unfair to judge a 1950s person on modern ethical standards, then is not not also a little unfair to judge a modern person on your father's ethical standards?