3 ms·
So while this is pretty accurate I think the last part could be said more nicely. I get why you’re upset / impassioned, I am too about this in general, but I b
by mikeiz404 6y ago
So while this is pretty accurate I think the last part could be said more nicely.
I get why you’re upset / impassioned, I am too about this in general, but I believe the person you are replying to was acting in good faith and giving a perspective most of us here do not have.
From a more pragmatic perspective this behavior discourages others, both directly and indirectly, from contributing in the future for fear of saying something wrong or incorrectly. Of course there is a balance.
- jancsika 6y agoFair point. Let me try again: That ToS is dangerous and should be changed ASAP. If OP knows the inner workings of Little League well enough to claim that the ToS is a case of overly-broad boilerplate, OP can message someone relevant in the org to tell them to change it so it isn't as dangerous. That doesn't address the broader problem of whether the data really is kept safe. But it at least raises the cost to someone who is considering (or already has considered) mining that data. I have a difficult time believing that an org with a non-negligible number of participants willing to risk harm to 8 year-olds for the benefit of their 11 year-old would have zero participants willing to leverage an overly-broad ToS for personal gain.