5 ms·
AVR = Augmented Virtual Reality. It's like CGI on steroids, crack, and speed at the same time. People still have the naivete to trust things because they are o
by cosmonaughty 6y ago
AVR = Augmented Virtual Reality. It's like CGI on steroids, crack, and speed at the same time.
People still have the naivete to trust things because they are on a screen. Preconceived notions cause one to mentally miss or gloss over the great artistry and manipulation in AVR cartoons.
The vid is worth the few minutes. It is a half decent scientific experiment that shows how rocket propulsion really works, and it shows an extra factor left out of the Newton's law argument: Ejective oxidation cannot occur without atmospheric containment pressure. Countless experiments have proven this. Buyer beware what they show you on a screen.
- shawnz 6y agoJust curious, are you experiencing some kind of psychosis? You have a strangely roundabout way of explaining your counterarguments here which doesn't seem to be really answering the question at all. Augmented Reality of course simply means integrating CGI into real footage. It is not "CGI on steroids". How would it help them fake the landing? Are you suggesting that the rover was computer generated, or the background? Why would they do either of those things when they have a real rover and real test environments on Earth they could film in? Also why do you keep mentioning oxidation? The helicopter is powered by an electric motor, so what does oxidation have to do with it?
- cosmonaughty 6y agoYou resort to ad hominem and assumptit. You are medicalizing dissent. Is that all you got? I didn't make any arguments or counterarguments. I called bullshit on the Mars landing cartoon. You saw your sacred cow was called into question, then insinuated psychosis because I don't believe in your sacred cow. All the video that NASA gives you is augmented Virtual reality cartoons. Oxidation came up because rocket propulsion does not and can not work in a vacuum, because combustion of propellant cannot occur in a real vacuum. That being the case, how did they get a rocket propelled device across millions of miles of interstellar vacuum? They didn't. NASA is playing you for suckers.
- shawnz 6y agoCan't reply to your other post unfortunately, but that's not true about rocket propulsion not working in a vacuum. You just have to mix the fuel with an oxidizer if oxygen isn't available. (EDIT: Or just use a method of propulsion other than combustion, but they are usually not as effective)