> If he restricted his focus to the highest performing funds of the past 10 - 30 years, he would have lost handily. Is that "funds which performed well before

> If he restricted his focus to the highest performing funds of the past 10 - 30 years, he would have lost handily. Is that "funds which performed well before 2008" or "funds which have performed mostly well since 2008"? The former makes sense since the latter is largely hindsight/time travel but couldn't the challenged party have picked those funds for their side of the bet back in 2008 anyway?