3 ms·
I suppose its a question of resource distribution. Should you spend your resources to nurture your best and brightest, or spend it to bring everyone up. Given
by wobblyasp 6y ago
I suppose its a question of resource distribution.
Should you spend your resources to nurture your best and brightest, or spend it to bring everyone up.
Given its public money, I suppose the latter is more desirable?
- deathanatos 6y agoI attended an advanced school as a student. We really didn't have any more resources than the non-advanced schools. It was simply a different, more advanced curriculum taught to those who both qualified (via test score) and were lucky (it was rationed via lottery). But we still had the same bad teacher:student ratio, the same ancient textbooks, a building in a terrible location, the bare minimum for athletics, etc.