3 ms·
If you take a random sample from a population, then you'd expect the sample to be representative of the population. All else being equal: if you categorize a po
by Kim_Bruning 6y ago
If you take a random sample from a population, then you'd expect the sample to be representative of the population. All else being equal: if you categorize a population in some arbitrary way, and there's a particular distribution of those categories in that population; you should expect the same distribution in your sample.
In this case the distribution in the population was not identical to the distribution in the sample.
Clearly something isn't right.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- rhino369 6y agoWhy would you expect the sample of gifted children to be representative of the population. By almost every measure Hispanic and Black students fall behind other students. The achievement gap is very well studied. The challenge is fixing the problem, not pretending it doesn’t exit by making white and Asian students educations worse. This is like the Boston PD issuing orders to shoot more unarmed Asians since black and Hispanics are shot more disproportionately.
- Kim_Bruning 6y agoIn this case the skew is pretty extreme though. In combination with other indicators, a strong gender/racial skew relative to the underlying population can be a predictor that your program or organization will be in trouble soon. Indeed, it seems to be in trouble at this time: The article states: "Cassellius says interest in the program had declined over several years[...]". So there are clearly more issues. My understanding of the article is that they're going on a one year hiatus to figure out the issues and fix them.
- rayiner 6y agoThe populations in these urban school districts are very skewed due to middle class Black and Latino populations migrating to the suburbs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_flight https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_flight. So the district comprises rich white yuppies, and lower income people of color, often recent immigrants, with little in-between. The school district addressed in Nice White Parents (great podcast) exemplifies this dynamic: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/23/podcasts/nice-white-parents-serial.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/23/podcasts/nice-white-paren....
- Kim_Bruning 6y agoSo according to you, it's due to demographics, where people are actually becoming more affluent! That does seem rather hopeful for the future. Thank you for taking the time to explain. Are you predicting that schools will have a rough time for the next generation or so, until the current generation (or the one after) become parents themselves?
- rayiner 6y agoYes and no. Immigrants are constantly coming in, and cities like Boston will probably continue to be a first waypoint for immigrants getting their legs under them. So in that sense, school districts in cities will continue to face these disparities. Apart from that, even as the Black middle class grows, there is persistent multi-generational poverty among Black people in urban areas that has proven nearly impossible to improve. Schools will continue to deal with that as well.
- hshshs2 6y agoimportant to note that is not really a clear cut case in boston, most kids in the boston public school system are not white (largely due to white flight to the suburbs when the city tried to desegregate schools)... this is despite the fact that boston itself has recently become predominately white (and white kids are going to private schools at a higher rate since... forever) this is changing slowly as the city gentrifies and the traditionally black neighborhoods are becoming less affordable for black people (who have an average net worth of only $8)... which I suppose is black flight, but the term is problematic because it’s evocative if white flight (which was a choice to avoid integration)... black flight largely is the lack of choice due to racial inequity
- NikolaeVarius 6y agoTwo other Asian kids and I were at a public school of several hundred kids of mostly minority groups. We three were consistently in the top 5 ranks and none of us were especially well off. Is there a racial issue here?
- sodality2 6y agoIntelligence being shown in schools isn't random: it's a result of who can afford better education in the lower grades, education materials in pre-school, a baby sitter who can teach basic math before school begins, private school, pre school, etc. This makes perfect sense, and the smart thing to do is to implement a program below this at the younger grades to try to give the entire lower grade levels a better chance at getting that advanced learning. "Something isn't right" doesn't mean kill the whole damn program. Maybe evaluate their on-boarding process in addition. In my elementary school, I was lucky enough to not miss the one day they were testing for advanced learning (if you missed it, tough luck: that was the only onboarding year) and it changed my school experience forever. I don't think I would be the person I am today, at all, if I had been sick that one day. If there are similar restrictions or barriers for entry that are not related to intelligence, they need to be looked into.
- Kim_Bruning 6y agoI agree that children should be taught to the maximum possible. I think that this particular program is in trouble though, sadly. Your experience sounds very interesting. Would you care to share some more? Were you in the Boston program, or elsewhere?
- sodality2 6y agoSure. It's just my district's extended learning program though, I am not in the Boston program. It was a program that started in elementary school (https://ycsd.yorkcountyschools.org/EXTENDCenter https://ycsd.yorkcountyschools.org/EXTENDCenter). In second grade they tested us for it, I don't remember a whole lot about it. I do remember it was logic-based and math-based. Every Wednesday from 2nd grade to 5th grade (then in middle school on a different schedule) we would spend in the extended learning program's building (a very small wing). We learned French (though looking back it was more preparing us to learn other languages than actually learning French), did science projects, wrote stuff about a random topic selected out of an encyclopedia, etc. It really is my most fond memory of school and I still keep in contact with the teacher. Over in the middle school side, we did more advanced topics. We studied the Ebola virus and how it affects the body, we wrote papers about an unknown John Doe in Yorktown in 1770's (then we literally walked to it, separate tangent below), we had a "socratic seminar" where we debated topics, we built a Rube Goldberg machine, all sorts of stuff. It actually changed my life. Anyone who says advanced education doesn't help simply doesn't see the changes a well-designed, thought out program has. And this was all in a public school. I checked their site recently and they are still running it even through the pandemic, which warms my heart. I mentioned the one-day, one-time onboarding process. They have since remedied it, instead scheduling tests with students chosen. This is a good solution and I'm glad they implemented it. Tangent: I lived in Yorktown Virginia, which is probably my second favorite thing about my childhood. The pre-school I went to was a 30 second walk down a hill to Yorktown Beach. In middle school, we read about the Revolutionary War, then took a field trip consisting of walking outside the doors, through the forest and 5 minutes of walking, and just like that we were where it actually took place, with monuments, statues, historical signs, etc.