3 ms·
They're saying that things will get better if money's role is reduced. That necessarily increases the relative influence of other things. In particular, they'
by anamax 15y ago
They're saying that things will get better if money's role is reduced. That necessarily increases the relative influence of other things. In particular, they're arguing for public money.
How many of you look at most govt officials and say "I want that person running my life."?
- rhizome 15y agoRight. Reducing the influence of one (of many) component will reduce the whole thing. It's not a zero-sum game where influence incontrovertibly remains constant with the various factors increasing in response to others' decrease. Influencers will try to maintain a given level of benefit for their efforts, of course, but that doesn't mean that reducing money's role won't have an overall effect at all. This is what you seem to be arguing.