4 ms·
> Well, I worked at Apple for about NN years. ... If Apple was claiming it cared about privacy, but was secretly doing the opposite, I think this fact would not
by wayneftw 6y ago
> Well, I worked at Apple for about NN years. ... If Apple was claiming it cared about privacy, but was secretly doing the opposite, I think this fact would not remain secret.
> I will give one more concrete example: the crash reporter system would send me a detailed stack trace, but NOT the original document. I was told explicitly that this was done for reasons of privacy ... I had no idea who the user was or what was in the document.
So you’ve had access to everything at Apple in your long career there, investigated it deeply the whole time and you’ve found nothing out of sorts. Got it.
This jives with what I’ve read about Apple’s internal culture - that there’s no compartmentalization at all and employees can roam freely around the halls collecting whatever information they want from any department.
I feel good now that you’ve investigated your own company and found no issues! Police unions should look into using this tactic of self-investigation. It seems quite effective!
(I hope I protected your privacy by removing the irrelevant parts of your comment. Sorry I had to paste them in there but you deleted them and then my response made no sense.
Also, sorry to have to use all of that sarcasm but you could’ve just answered the question. It’s Apple. Apple investigates if Apple apps for doing any sort of improper data collection.)
- herodotus 6y agoOK, I get the point, which is why I removed the story. Do you mind deleting what I wrote from your comment?
- wayneftw 6y agoI removed most of it. I guess email dang if you feel that what’s left is too sensitive.
- dang 6y agoPersonal attacks will get you banned here. We've had to warn you about this more than once before. Please don't do it again. (Edit: I got this part wrong - sorry wayneftw! It's particularly bad that you bullied another user into removing what was probably an interesting story. That makes the thread strictly worse, whether or not you felt like it answered your specific question.) Would you mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the spirit of this site more to heart? The intention is curious conversation—not bashing other people or their positions, even if you feel like they have wrong positions.
- wayneftw 6y ago> It's particularly bad that you bullied another user into removing what was probably an interesting story. That's not what happened. They removed it before I even posted a reply. By the time my reply came up, their story was gone and I had to navigate backwards to copy it. Please look at timestamps or something and remove this warning. Aside from that, the story was not interesting. It just said that they worked there for a number of years and that their coworkers seemed trustworthy. Also that they couldn't get user documents along with stack traces. I left the most salient bits. > Personal attacks will get you banned here. Where's the personal attack? I responded directly to what their comment said, nothing more. And, I didn't get personal - I got sarcastic about what they said. And I apologized for it.
- dang 6y agoYikes that's bad - I'm sorry! I made up a story around a wrong assumption. I try not to, and I tell HN users several times a day not to, yet it's still incredibly easy. I've added a note to my comment above, and I'll try to remember this case for similar occasions in the future. Re personal attack - if you go after what another person is saying that aggressively and use the second-person pronoun a lot, it starts to bleed into personal attack. Particularly "you’ve found nothing out of sorts. Got it" struck me as attacking the other person's integrity.