12 ms·
“Doesn’t seem to have been harmed”? His life was upended. He gave up his full time practice and moved on to writing as his #1 source of income. That’s because
by jmeister 6y ago
“Doesn’t seem to have been harmed”?
His life was upended. He gave up his full time practice and moved on to writing as his #1 source of income.
That’s because he managed the situation spectacularly well. Imagine if NYT had gone ahead with the doxx earlier: it could have disrupted his life a lot more.
Rationalists are angry about the principles/norms being violated. The outcome doesn’t negate the criticisms.
On the other hand, it’s clear that the Left is willing to throw principles under the bus in pursuit of outcomes desirable to them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who,_whom%3F https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who,_whom%3F
- sbilstein 6y agoRight...cause the man isn't taking appointments. Oh wait, he is still practicing. https://lorienpsych.com/ https://lorienpsych.com/
- jmeister 6y ago“ Substack convinced me that I could make decent money here. With that in place, I felt like I could also take a chance on starting my dream business. ... So I'm going to try to start a medical practice that provides great health care to uninsured people for 4x less than what anyone else charges.” It’s a side project right now, not his primary source of income. Also: process and principles, not outcome https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/still-alive https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/still-alive