I'm sorry, but this reads like something a first–year student in English literature, critical theory, and whatnot—would write. It lacks density, does not introd

I'm sorry, but this reads like something a first–year student in English literature, critical theory, and whatnot—would write. It lacks density, does not introduce new language, and frankly, I'm not sure how this is supposed to add anything to our understanding of the subject... The text seems to criticise the surrounding discourse, and attributes much of it to right–wing political ideology and some sense of exploitation, but fails to engage this point further—in any capacity. Moreover, the text exhibits quite a bit of political signalling in its own right; plenty of externality talk and not much beyond that. Well, yeah, "externality" is a cool word, but it's not hard to see that it doesn't add anything, unless further critique manages to display contradictory economic, social, or political conditions—arising from such externalities. It almost seems like you can stamp "postmodern" in front of any modern concept, bring it to the context of some pseudo–Marxist frame of thinking, and there you go, seemingly you've done analysis.