> there is a market of people that like originals, except now there is a greater assurance of it being the original for it to have some value there must be con

> there is a market of people that like originals, except now there is a greater assurance of it being the original for it to have some value there must be consensus around it. if I have the same exact copy of the digital art and I am selling it in a market that does not recognize NFT as proof (think about China that doesn't even recognize patents) what value does this hold? or if two competing entities are both claiming to have emitted the one true token, which one do I trust? we are thinking today: the artist can tell which one is the good one, but what if is the future and the artist is dead? do we need a token that identifies the artist statement? and who verifies that the content of the email was not forged? isn't a piece of paper with a signature in a closet inside a notary office a simple mechanism? What makes NFT special, except that probably collector are actually paying to collect NFTs and not the item attached to them? I know many collectors, I don't see them collecting digital fingerprints