4 ms·
Cool, cool, but there are _so_ many ways of providing the same user experience of digital ownership without involving a blockchain. So why not go with something
by boffinism 6y ago
Cool, cool, but there are _so_ many ways of providing the same user experience of digital ownership without involving a blockchain. So why not go with something simpler?
- cloudking 6y agoYou own your token on a decentralized database (blockchain) that is immutable, vs access to an entry in a centralized database owned by someone else, that can be deleted.
- africanboy 6y agoa certificate of authenticity could be destroyed. the money in the bank could disappear (physically they don't exist anymore) a blockchain could become unaccessible blockchain doesn't guarantee eternity (for example no electricity or no internet connection, no blockchain)
- boffinism 6y agoThere's only value there for as long as that particular blockchain is still considered authoritative and interesting.