2 ms·
Agree on all counts. I chose ME for size and startup time, but 2000 is even better. Truly the peak of Windows, IMO. XP is more compatible, but it also started d
by forgotmypw17 6y ago
Agree on all counts. I chose ME for size and startup time, but 2000 is even better. Truly the peak of Windows, IMO. XP is more compatible, but it also started down the road of candy-coating the native widgets and rejiggling Control Panel. You could opt out of both, but it was the beginning of the decline.