I can understand it if wrapping crypto/some form of chain around a piece of digital media made it non-fungible. But that is horseshit (afaict), as the op’s anal

I can understand it if wrapping crypto/some form of chain around a piece of digital media made it non-fungible. But that is horseshit (afaict), as the op’s analogy goes. It’s not making or scarce, it’s making up to a billion people be able to ‘own’ a part of it. And it’s digital so anyone can copy it. It doesn’t even come in a nice frame. I realise this is just having a go at a single part of your conversation, that I otherwise have no issue with