3 ms·
They actually didn't, because none of these were miniaturized PDPs in the sense they were compatible. As you say, they were variants, and they didn't actually r
by classichasclass 6y ago
They actually didn't, because none of these were miniaturized PDPs in the sense they were compatible. As you say, they were variants, and they didn't actually run the same software as the real PDP-8s or PDP-11s. Substantial modification was required and some OSes and application software was never ported. The DEC Pros in particular suffered from poorer performance as well (the 380 finally bettered this but was too little too late).
If DEC had actually sold a compatible microcomputer PDP system, they might have done better commercially, but instead they used the PDP architecture to build related but incompatible systems so as to not cannibalize sales of their big iron. In that sense, they were successful, because they sold very poorly.
I like my 380 with Venix, but it's a dead end.
- ghaff 6y agoIn a way, none of this mattered at the end of the day anyway. If one leaves aside the sui generis and complicated story of Apple, PCs became a commodity business in any case. It wasn't a sustainable business for any of the large companies that also wanted to fund research labs and otherwise invest in new technology areas.