5 ms·
I don't know if true, but here I heard rumours it is basically like this: the company needs to restructure, everybody knows it, but there is too much Powerplay
by andi999 6y ago
I don't know if true, but here I heard rumours it is basically like this: the company needs to restructure, everybody knows it, but there is too much Powerplay inside the company to agree on anything (like the manager doesn't want to tell his team of 200 people that their department is history). So as a compromise it is agreed to hire a consulting firm to reshape the company for the 22nd century, with the agreement to implement their advise.
So what the consulting company then does is trying to find out what the stakeholders really want and write it in their recommendation.
I dont really know if I shd believe that, but at least it also explains why a consulting firm can recommend one year one thing, and next year the opposite for the same company (interest of stakeholders changed)
- huitzitziltzin 6y ago> the company needs to restructure, everybody knows it, but there is too much Powerplay inside the company to agree on anything This is more or less the role of consultants in the movie Office Space, I think. McK et al seem like a very, very expensive way to do that. But if firms are paying for kind of "referee services" (as in: make this decision for us because we can't) then I understand. Why they don't want industry experts w/ subject matter expertise is puzzling to me.