3 ms·
It's not so clear ternary would actually be an improvement: at least in terms of how we can implement circuits today, ternary's radix efficiency is offset by th
by rcxdude 6y ago
It's not so clear ternary would actually be an improvement: at least in terms of how we can implement circuits today, ternary's radix efficiency is offset by the inefficiency of implementing ternary logic. It might work if you have a new way of constructing logic circuits where this efficiency difference doesn't appear.
(see https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.06841 https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.06841)