4 ms·
The confusion is worsened by people interpreting it as "[an] (entity component) system" or "[an] ((entity) (component)) system", when it's actually "[an] Entity
by djur 6y ago
The confusion is worsened by people interpreting it as "[an] (entity component) system" or "[an] ((entity) (component)) system", when it's actually "[an] Entity–component–system [architecture]". That is, it's not a system of entities and components, it's an architecture comprising entities, components, and systems.
- beaconstudios 6y agoit's not surprising given that "entity component system" is synonymous with "thing behaviour environment". It's using the most meaningless generic terms possible. It's like when companies use a tagline like "using innovative practices to deliver results for our clients".