4 ms·
The documentation states that it uses a non-allocated country code (+21). So it seems unlikely to happen.
by corentin88 6y ago
The documentation states that it uses a non-allocated country code (+21). So it seems unlikely to happen.
- dustymcp 6y agoDoesnt this defeat the purpose tho as it could be filtered?
- 0x426577617265 6y agoYes, this data could be quickly mitigated.
- o-__-o 6y agoThe us government monitored all DC residents personal communication for over 2 years because they fat fingered the collection regex. The country code for Egypt is +20, the DC area code is 202.
- IAmGraydon 6y agoYou think that was a mistake, huh?
- grandinj 6y agoThat is a mistake that sounds suspiciously self serving, given how many powerful people live and work there
- toast0 6y ago+21 isn't allocated, but +211 South Sudan +212 Morocco +213 Algeria +216 Tunisia +218 Libya Someone putting random numbers after +21 because it's unallocated has a fundamental misunderstanding of international phone numbers. But also, the server side is likely to throw away invalid numbers to start with. It's simple and easy to do, and reduces the data storage by a lot (there's a lot of garbage in people's address books)