Guess why they require a CLA to be signed: Without publication of the source code, Signal is treating the server code as non-AGPL. This is totally within their

Guess why they require a CLA to be signed: Without publication of the source code, Signal is treating the server code as non-AGPL. This is totally within their rights, since they own the code, including contributions, thanks to the CLA which allows re-licensing contributions under an OSI license, not all of which require disclosing source code for network services. https://community.signalusers.org/t/where-is-new-signal-server-code-why-not-share-signal https://community.signalusers.org/t/where-is-new-signal-serv...